﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><channel><totalitems>137</totalitems><casualities>7</casualities><lasthour>0</lasthour><title>GDACS EMM News Feed</title><description>
                                                        Europe Media Monitor (EMM) reads and analyses around 40.000 new news items per day from around 1000 sites worldwide. The text of the items, extracted using EMM's own text extraction algorithm, is indexed using Lucene (see http://lucene.apache.org). Please make sure your area of interest is not already covered by one of the pre-defined categories (alerts). If it is, we kindly ask you to use the feed from that category as this significantly reduces the load on our system. This site is a joint project of DG-JRC and DG-COMM. The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer (see http://europa.eu/geninfo/legal_notices_en.htm). Please acknowledge EMM when (re)using this material
                                                    </description><item><title>Scientists think they might know if an earthquake is the main event, or if a bigger one is coming</title><link>https://www.stuff.co.nz/science/116426231/scientists-think-they-might-know-if-an-earthquake-is-the-main-event-or-if-a-bigger-one-is-coming</link><description>Swiss researchers think they might have come up with a method to help determine whether a big earthquake is the main event, or if an even bigger shake is on the way. They are suggesting a simple traffic light classification system could be used to indicate the probability that a larger event will follow the initial earthquake.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:37:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>Stuff-be59172e173806de07d86e25cd045ee5</guid><sortelement xmlns="emm">20191009193700</sortelement></item><item><title>After a quake, can we tell if a bigger one is coming?</title><link>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=12275057&amp;ref=rss</link><description>After a large quake, could we accurately predict whether an even bigger one is on its way? That's something Swiss researchers have explored in a new study, in which they were able to use a method to make predictions with near 100 per cent accuracy. However, New Zealand scientists say their findings,....</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:13:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>nzherald-1b4ecf1986bc41e969f476ab6d7c61c2</guid><sortelement xmlns="emm">20191009191300</sortelement></item><item><title>Earth sciences: Traffic light system for earthquake classification(Nature)</title><link>http://www.natureasia.com/en/research/highlight/13107</link><description>A simple traffic light classification system that can be used to indicate the probability of a subsequent larger event following an earthquake is reported this week in Nature. The approach may help with managing responses after an earthquake. Large earthquakes are often followed by aftershocks that....</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:37:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>natureasia-en-2a1ee6641ae030a2825e72b6f5047a29</guid><sortelement xmlns="emm">20191009173700</sortelement></item><item><title>Did a 1964 Earthquake Bring a Dangerous Fungus to the Pacific Northwest?</title><link>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/did-1964-earthquake-bring-dangerous-fungus-pacific-northwest-180973268/</link><description>A new study posits that tsunamis triggered by the Great Alaska Earthquake washed Cryptococcus gattii onto the shore

On March 27, 1964, Alaska’s Prince William Sound region was hit by a 9.2-magnitude earthquake, the . Around 139 people died , largely due to the series of tsunamis that swelled along....</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:21:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>smithsonianmag-f4f269d878aadd9a16fb698d2c0c6862</guid><sortelement xmlns="emm">20191009172100</sortelement></item></channel></rss>